Public Value Failure: “When Efficient Markets May Not Do”
نویسنده
چکیده
The familiar market failure model remains quite useful for issues of price efficiency and traditional utilitarianism, but has many shortcomings as an aid to understanding the public value aspects of public policy and management. In developing a public value failure model, I present diagnostic criteria for values problems not easily addressed by market failure models. Public value failure occurs when: (1) mechanisms for values articulation and aggregation have broken down; (2) “imperfect monopolies” occur; (3) benefit hoarding occurs (i.e. public domain benefits and public goods have been captured by groups, limiting distribution to the population); (4) there is a scarcity of providers of public value; (5) a short time horizon threatens public value; (6) there is a focus on substitutability of assets that threatens conservation of public resources; (7) social and market transactions threaten fundamental human subsistence. After providing examples of public failure diagnostics, including an extended example concerning the market for human organs, I introduce a “public failure grid” to help interpret policy issues according to public failure criteria. The basic point of the grid is a simple one: market failure-success and public failure-success are independent dimensions and, thus, market failure criteria are rarely sufficient for public policy decision-making. Considering the joint criteria holds promise of improved policy outcomes by addressing both economic efficiency and public value.
منابع مشابه
Active Management in Mostly Efficient Markets
This survey of the literature on the value of active management shows that the average active manager does not outperform but that a significant minority of active managers do add value. Further, studies suggest that investors may be able to identify superior active managers (SAMs) in advance by using public information. Investors who can identify SAMs should be able to improve their overall Sh...
متن کاملBehavioral Public Choice: the Behavioral Paradox of Government Policy
What are the economic justifications for government intervention in the economy? In a market economy, prices coordinate the activities of buyers and sellers and convey information about the strength of consumer demand for a good and the costs of supplying it. Because trade is voluntary, buyers and sellers only make exchanges when both parties benefit. Under ideal market conditions, this process...
متن کاملPublic and Private Guarantee Funds with Market Fragility
When buyers worry that sellers may not remain in the market long enough to fulfill all contractual obligations, they may be unwilling to purchase and a market failure can result. Bank deposits and pension benefits are examples of contracts for which buyers might lose confidence in sellers, making these markets “fragile.” This paper studies market fragility created by both fundamental (i.e., cos...
متن کاملCommunication: A Vital Tool in the Implementation of Monetary Policy
The members of these two organizations play an instrumental role in ensuring the efficient functioning of North America’s financial markets and, from a central bank perspective, the efficient transmission of monetary policy. You are, therefore, among the Bank of Canada’s key target audiences. We rely on the effective twoway flow of information between the Bank and financial markets in order to ...
متن کاملHalliburton and the Integrity of the Public Corporation
When a market for a stock is efficient, the fraud-on-the-market presumption requires courts to initially assume that investors who bought the stock relied on the integrity of the market price. This presumption is critical in establishing the common reliance necessary to certify a class when such investors assert a securities fraud claim under SEC Rule 10b-5. The validity of the fraud-on-the-mar...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2000